Memphis Murder Mayhem: History Repeats?
A Memphis man was recently charged with one of the most dastardly crimes imaginable. This Shelby County resident is accused of having killed his girlfriend and then, with the unwilling help of her daughter, he is alleged to have cut her body into pieces. Apparently, the accused was not sure of the victim's death. The Memphis police charge that he then burned her body parts and spread them around West Tennessee. The Shelby County Medical Examiner confirmed the victim's identity by DNA tests and dental records.
The accused has been sent for a mental competency test, but if he goes to trial the Judge will require that the jury find him guilty, if so they do, beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty. These words that bear such huge legal significance were "invented" by someone. The use of forensic dental testing did not begin with CSI. Let us wander back into legal history and explore the origin of these important concepts in Tennessee law.
The case of Dr. John Webster was of immense importance for the emerging law of the United States. Dr. Webster was a scholar of some significance, if not wealth. Most of Webster's peers came from old money and they dabbled at teaching for amusement. Dr. George Parker was one of these men.
THE ACCUSED

THE VICTIM

Parker was a man of financial means. He, and his family before him, were wealthy and had large real estate holdings. The accused, Dr. Webster, had borrowed the large sum of $400.00 from Dr. Parker. As was his custom, Parker made his rounds once a month to collect his rents and loan interest. On the fateful day, Parker approached Webster's laboratory intending to collect on his debt. After Webster said that he could not repay Parker, an argument broke out. In order to make his point, Webster punctuated his argument by whacking Parker in the head with a piece of firewood from the nearby hearth of the fireplace in his lab. Parker concluded his portion of the drama by expiring on the floor in a pool of his own blood.
In 1850, Dr. John Webster was tried for the murder of Dr. Parkman in Boston, Massachusetts. The trial judge for what was to become a celebrated case was the Hon. Lemuel Shaw.
THE JUDGE

It is Judge Shaw's explanation of reasonable doubt that is most historically definitive. In 1850, the standard in murder cases was proof "to an absolute certainty" that the dead body was that of the victim, or absolute proof of corpus delicti. The Webster case was one of the first capital cases to be won without absolute evidence that the victim had been murdered. It could not be established that the bones discovered were Parkman's. Judge Shaw opened the door for the jury to convict anyway by changing the standard. He instructed them that they need only prove corpus delicti "beyond a reasonable doubt."
The evidence must establish the corpus delicti.... must not only prove a death by violence, but must, to a reasonable extent, exclude the hypothesis of suicide, and a death by the act of any other person. This is to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.Then, what is reasonable doubt? ... It is not mere possible doubt; because everything relating to human affairs and depending on moral evidence is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge.
THE EVIDENCE

Dr. Nathan C. Keep, who later became the first Dean of the Harvard Dental School, provided dental testimony during the trial of John Webster. It was the first trial in which dental evidence was introduced, and one of the first to admit forensic evidence as reliable. Dr. Keep's direct examination was, even by today's standards, exquisitely conducted. The prosecutor developed his witness's qualifications; the basis for his opinions; and Dr. Keep's opinion that the tooth found in Dr. Webster's lab was the same one that Keep had implanted into George Parker's jaw.
It was upon this basis that Dr. John Webster was found guilty by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty for the murder of Dr. George Parker. He was subsequently hanged. The joinder of all of these now familiar concepts in one trial is, from a historical perspective, amazing. The next time that you hear the term "reasonable doubt", think kindly of Judge Shaw.

